Time certainty
Construction projects are often seen to be a balance between three related performance indicators; time, cost and quality. Generally, an increace in quality will result in an increase in cost and time, a reduction in time will result in an increase in cost and so on.
For clients and contractors in the construction industry, time certainty is one of the most important performance criteria.
Time certainty is the likelihood that even before a project starts, but also during the project, it will be completed within the required time. Time certainty is also affected by cost certainty which is the likelihood that a project will be completed within the budgetary requirements.
Construction clients often hold these two concepts as their top priorities as delays and cost overruns can lead to higher costs for the client and a possible diminished relationship between client, contractor, occupants, customers and so on. For contractors, an excessive time extension to the project programme may mean lower than expected profits and a diminution of reputation and competitiveness.
Construction projects tend to be high-risk undertakings which very frequently generate time and cost overruns. Typical factors that can delay a project include:
- Clients making sudden changes and introducing variations.
- Slow decision-making.
- Unforeseen ground conditions.
- Delays in material supply.
- Inclement weather.
- Disputes.
- Defects.
- Changes in market conditions.
A 1996 study by the Construction Industry Board (CIB) revealed that time certainty (and also cost certainty) is more often than not likely to be under the contractor’s control. This is mainly because time overruns are frequently seen to be:
- Symptomatic of poor management.
- The contractors’ inability to predict and control the time needed to complete a project.
- Inaccurate material estimating.
- Poor labour productivity.
- Inadequate planning.
- Poor site management.
If delays occur on a project, contractors are impacted almost immediately by additional costs resulting from:
- Increases in overheads.
- Hiring more operatives.
- Longer plant-hire periods.
- Storage of materials.
- Delayed payments from the client or penalties.
In their paper ‘Cost Certainty and Time Certainty: An International Investigation’ (Hong Xiao and David G Proverbs), time certainty was found to be largely dependent on first, cost certainty and second, the importance contractors allocate to cost, comparing them to the two sides of the same coin; neglecting one will have an adverse effect on the other. Also, the authors maintain that projects completed on time are those where the contractor realises there is no other option and so does as much as possible to bring this about.
Greater planning input by the contractor is also known to have a positive effect on improving project performance (Faniran et al., 2001) and is why faster projects are usually found to be cheaper at the tender stage, punctual to deadlines and completed to customers’ satisfaction (NEDO, 1988).
A possible indicator of a contractor’s time certainty is that delays on previous similar projects are likely to reoccur on future projects. A good reputation is therefore critical for time certainty performance.
Generally time certainty improves as a project progresses, as there are fewer remaining risks that could affect project completion.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Acceleration of construction works
- Adverse weather during construction
- Certificate of non completion
- Common refusals of extensions of time
- Completion date in construction contracts
- Concurrent delay
- Contract administrator for construction contracts
- Contractor delay.
- Defects in construction
- Delays on construction projects
- Extension of time - approval letter example
- Force majeure in construction
- How to prepare a claim for an extension of time
- Liquidated damages in construction contracts
- Loss and expense
- Nominated sub-contractor
- Octoesse LLP v Trak Special Projects Ltd
- Practical completion
- Prolongation in construction contracts
- Reasonable time.
- Relevant event
- Relevant events v relevant matters
- Relevant matters in construction contracts
- Time at large
- Variations in construction contracts
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.